Chicago vs Washington for couples
Chicago and Washington are both in the United States, about 956 km apart. Every figure below comes from the data behind our city pages: an estimated monthly cost for a couple, tax tier, annual climate, safety, healthcare, internet speed, language and residency rules. Washington leads on cost.
12 questions, about 4 minutes, no account needed. Taking the quiz is free, and so is seeing your #1 city. Full results for both of you are a one-time US$12 (€12 in Europe).
Side by side
Source: the datasets behind our city pages. Cost is our model estimate (a country-level cost index scaled for city size); tax tiers are assigned by hand from each country's top marginal income tax rate and overall tax reputation; temperature from the Open-Meteo archive (2019 to 2023 averages); rainfall from TerraClimate (1991 to 2020 normals); safety and healthcare are our own country-level estimates; internet from the Ookla Speedtest Global Index; English from the EF English Proficiency Index; residency from our hand-reviewed residency dataset (not legal advice); short-stay entry from the passport-index dataset.
Factor by factor
Cost of living
Washington is cheaper: we estimate about €4,101 a month for a couple living centrally, against €4,338 in Chicago. That is €237 a month, or 5%, less.
Taxes
Same country, same tax: the United States is in our low to medium tax tier.
Climate
Washington is 3°C warmer on average over the year: 14°C against 11°C in Chicago. Rainfall is similar: about 991 mm a year in Chicago and 1,093 mm in Washington.
Safety
Our safety score is country-level, so both cities get the same 52 out of 100.
Healthcare
Our healthcare score is country-level, so both cities get the same 70 out of 100.
Internet
Our broadband figure is country-level: about 220 Mbps median fixed download in both.
Language
Main languages in both: English. English proficiency is rated the same in both: English everywhere.
Residency and visas
Same country, same rules: long-term residency in the United States is rated possible, with conditions.
Which one fits a couple
On the factors we measure, Washington leads on cost (€4,101 against €4,338 a month), and Chicago leads on none of them. What our data does not cover can still tip it toward Chicago: jobs, family nearby, or simply which one each of you prefers after a visit.
Climate can pull the two of you apart too: a partner who wants warmth leans toward Washington (14°C on average), while one who minds the heat leans toward Chicago (11°C).
Size differs too: Chicago is a large city (1 to 5 million people) and Washington a mid-sized one (250,000 to 1 million people). Chicago is inland; Washington is coastal.
OurNextCity has each partner answer 12 questions privately, then ranks Chicago, Washington and 913 other cities for both of you at once.
Read more
Other comparisons
- Chicago vs New York City
- Chicago vs Los Angeles
- Chicago vs Philadelphia
- Chicago vs Toronto
- Chicago vs Vancouver
- Chicago vs Montréal
- Chicago vs Ottawa
- Chicago vs Calgary
- Washington vs New York City
- Washington vs Philadelphia
- Washington vs Los Angeles
- Washington vs Toronto
- Washington vs Montréal
- Washington vs Ottawa